Dr. Kerry Spencer
Critical Analysis
27 October 2011
The Solitude of Self: The Female Condition
In the year of 1867, Mark Twain wrote in a letter to the St. Louis Missouri Democrat his opinion on women suffrage. “Women, go your ways! Seek not to beguile us of our imperial privileges. Content yourself with your little feminine trifles--your babies, your benevolent societies and your knitting--and let your natural bosses do the voting” (Schmidt). So was the thought of many Americans in the 19th century. On the other hand, Elizabeth Cady Stanton fought for equal rights among women. In her speech, “The Solitude of Self,” Stanton uses an appeal to ethos, imagery, and a strong appeal to the emotions of women, as well as the individuality of a human being, to effectively convince her audience that women deserve equality.
Firstly, Stanton appeals to ethos by exercising her own authority to stress her point of women’s rights. Elizabeth Cady Stanton was extremely influential in the 19th century in the fight for the equality of women. Therefore, she has a voice to pay heed to. Although she never voices her stance in politics or her influence on American society in that day, her authority has an influence on her audience simply if the reader knows who she is.
In addition to Stanton’s use of ethos, she uses imagery to describe the cruelty of denying a woman her right to complete an education as well as having political equality. For example, Stanton says, “To throw obstacle in the way of a complete education is like putting out the eyes; to deny the rights of property, like cutting off the hands” (Stanton 165). This vivid imagery forces gruesome images into the readers’ minds. Because Stanton compares the restrictions of a woman to complete an education with the violence of cutting off the hands, the reader’s opinion on women’s education, whatever it may be, is tainted in Stanton’s favor.
Again, Stanton applies imagery by sharing the story of the play, “Titus Andronicus,” written by William Shakespeare.
“Shakespeare’s play of “Titus Andronicus” contains a terrible satire on woman’s position in the nineteenth century. Rude men (the play tells us) seized the king’s daughter, cut out her tongue, cut off her hands, and then bade her go call for water and wash her hands. What a picture of woman’s position” (165).
To reiterate Stanton, what a picture of woman’s position! Stanton’s application of this play is effective in the way that it perfectly expresses her opinion of the woman’s condition. Rather than having her hands cut off, women are robbed of their natural rights by law and custom, and yet, she is left to depend on herself similarly to the girl who is expected to go call for water and wash her hands with no tongue or hands.
Last is Stanton’s strongest tool: her emotional appeal to women, as well as the individuality of a human soul. Her emotional appeal is the meat of her speech. When she addresses women directly, she is highly effective in many ways. Obviously, she does this simply by addressing the rights women wanted to see happen; equality in social life, opportunities for higher education, personal responsibility in her personal life, and independent action. The list goes on, and Stanton does an excellent job presenting her argument and gains the support of her fellow women.
Another way she appeals to the emotion of women is through sharing stories of exemplary women during their day. One of the stories she shares happened during the catastrophic storm in the Bay of Biscay. A tidal wave caused destruction and amongst other buildings, the women’s prison was destroyed. Of the women who escaped, they caught sight of men struggling to reach the shore. Banding together, the women brought six men to shore and carried them further to safety. It’s stories like these that make women proud to be women. This story is also effective because it was a real happening, and therefore, it strongly supports Stanton’s opinion that women are just as capable as men.
Her emotional appeal to women is very clear and although she doesn’t directly appeal to men, she does appeal to the individuality of a human being. Hence the title, “The Solitude of Self.” For example, Stanton shares a story pertinent to all humanity. It’s a story of a young girl who helped decorate a Christmas tree for a family she served. When she found there was no present for her, she slipped away and spent the night crying in a field. Stanton applies the “solitude of self” and says, “No mortal will ever know the thoughts that passed through the mind of that friendless child in the long hours of that cold night, with only the silent starts to keep her company” (Stanton 165). Stanton hits close to home for everyone. Everyone, man and woman, young and old, has, in one way or another, experienced “the awful solitude of individual life” (Stanton 165).
In conclusion, Elizabeth Cady Stanton effectively convinces her audience of women equality by using an appeal to ethos, imagery, and an appeal to the emotions of women and the individuality of a human soul. Elizabeth Cady Stanton, along with many other activists, worked hard to change the opinions of their fellow Americans. Consequently, in 1901, Mark Twain was quoted in The New York Times concerning his new opinion of a woman’s role in the government. He said, “I know that since the women started out on their crusade they have scored in every project they undertook against unjust laws. I would like to see them help make the laws and those who are to enforce them. I would like to see the whiplash in women's hands” (Schmidt).
Works Cited
Schmidt, Barbara. "Mark Twain Quotations, Newspaper Collections, & Related Resources." (1997): n. page. Print.
Stanton, Elizabeth Cady. “The Solitude of Self.” Reading For Intensive Writers. 5th ed. Comp. Susan Jorgensen. Provo: BYU Academic Publishing, 2007. Print.
Nice work.
ReplyDeleteJust a few things.
That introductory quote by Mark Twain sounded sarcastic. I don't think that was his real opinion. It is possible that it was, but if it is uncertain, I would just say that that is something he said, and not that it was his opinion or not. Just be sure to check up on that first.
Some awkward wording in places: at the end of the third paragraph, you say "tainted in Stanton's favor." "Tainted" has a negative connotation so I suggest using a different word like "shifted" or something. Also towards the end of what I think is the 8th paragraph, I think "was a real happening" should be replace by something like "really happened."
Also, I had an issue with your list of tools: appeal to ethos, imagery, and appeal to the emotions of women. While this is consistent with the rest of the paper, my issue here is that the items on the list are different types of things. Appeal to ethos and appeal to emotion are WAYS a connection with the audience is made USING tools, while imagery is a type of tool. Appeals to such-and-such can be used to categorize the specific tools, but they are on different levels of the hierarchy, so it sounds a little strange when they are listed together. I hope that makes sense.
Anyway, keep up the good work.
Oops. There was one more tool on your list that I didn't see: "[appeal to the] individuality of a human being." My bad.
ReplyDeleteSo in general here are my thoughts. I think that your paragraphs were a little under developed. You picked out some great tools that I liked, it might help to expound upon them a little more. You should probably say who your audience is. I wonder if it is men or women, or maybe even both? Is she trying to convince other women to take up this fight for the equality of women or what?? You mention in one of your paragraphs that Stanton is addressing the rights that women wanted to see happen ( i would reword that by the way ) but then you say that she is trying to gain the support of the women? Seemed to me that they would already support her then? So just a little confusion there haha. From a historical point of the view ( I learned about this in another class ) a lot of women were content with their positions in society for a long time.
ReplyDeleteThere was also a sentence that confused me " Although she never voices her stance in politics or her influence on American society in that day, her authority has an influence on her audience simply if the reader knows who she is." I think I know what you're trying to say, it is your main point of the paragraph though so I think it might help to make it very clear and hard hitting.
I feel like I wrote a lot, sorry! Hopefully what I said makes sense and will help you with your revision! good luck and good job!
-Heather Del Nero
It wasn't as powerful as I thought it could be. There were a couple awkward spots and it was a little vague. Next time, be more powerful and forward about what you want to say and organize it a better so it is easier to read.
ReplyDelete-Aubrey Bennett
First off, I agree with Heather about rephrasing the sentence "Although she never voices her stance in politics or her influence on American society in that day, her authority has an influence on her audience simply if the reader knows who she is." Maybe you could say that "Although in her day Stanton never voiced her stance in politics or used her influence on American society, today her audiences respect her influence and authority." Just a suggestion.
ReplyDeleteAlso, in your second to last sentence, in a quote, you misspelled 'stars' as 'starts.' A nit picky thing, but it helps.
I believe you are trying to use a block quote for Shakespeare, and maybe it just didn't translate right in being posted on the blog, but block quotes are intended twice and don't need quotation marks or to be italicized.
Lastly, when you refer to the tools she uses, like an appeal to ethos, bring specific evidence in if you can; direct quotes from the text are best if you can find them, or paraphrase what she's saying and in commentary link it to the tool. And limiting the passive voice (the 'to be' verbs) will strengthen your voice.
Otherwise, great job. Your tone is friendly and relaxed, not stilted or high handed, and you picked great tools.
Lindsay Painter
I really enjoyed "The Solitude of Self," and I really enjoyed your interpretation of the piece. Your thesis was clear and concise, and your paragraphs followed your thesis very well. I do not think your analysis of appeal to ethos was strong enough or supported enough. I think that it could be backed up with quotes more, if you can. However, I think that you other two arguments are strong and well supported. Your essay overall was very well written, and your analysis was strong. Good work:)
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI've been doing this every week, and I've just had to redefine the potential of a critical analysis. In fact, I already have a few ideas of well-employed techniques used in your critical analysis above that could easily be justified in a critical analysis on your critical analysis.
ReplyDeleteThese include your portrayal of Elizabeth Cady Stanton as an influential individual through provided background information and the change she instilled in Mark Twain's opinion on women's suffrage. Also it includes your use of these elements in your introduction and conclusion. To give you an idea: I just ate a very, very, good sandwich, and I must say, your paper definitely compares.
- Forrest Lamb
I think you did an awesome job! Keep up the good work!
ReplyDeleteJust one thing, I really like the quote in the opening paragraph. I feel like your thesis could be a little stronger, I found it to be a bit disorganized. But other than that, great job!
Well done!
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed it. In comparison to some other posts about this same article, I found myself much more captivated by your arguments than by others. First I really like the outline that you create in your thesis that allows me, the reader to follow and expect what you are going to say. I really like the opening as well. It really caught my attention because of the ridiculous ignorance of the quote, so in short it was a really great hook.
Good job Shay! I thought that the paper was well organized, interesting, and the stories that you used proved your points. In the second paragraph,it seems like you switch between past tense and present tense. I know that you are supposed to write in the present tense, but the last sentence in that paragraph was especially confusing.Other than that, good job. :]
ReplyDeleteNice analysis. You should add more definite evidence if possible. It helps your analysis. Your paragraphs did feel a little underdeveloped and your thesis was a little unclear. Try to rewrite it to make it clearer. Good job!
ReplyDeleteI agree more examples would be nice
ReplyDeleteYour first quote definitely grabbed my attention, and your introduction was also great. Good work!
ReplyDelete--Jamie Smith