If you're in BYU Writing 150H sections 122, 126, or 129 you're in the right place.


My name is Dr. SWILUA. (Pronounced "Swill-oo-ah") That's short for "She Who Is Like Unto Aphrodite." It's my official title, thanks.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Kevin's Analysis of "Mother Eve"

Kevin Pett
Professor Spencer
Writing 150
11/14/11
Mother Eve: villain or heroine?

Eve, the mother of the whole Earth, has developed a reputation of the one that was deceived by the snake and the reason we are here on Earth instead of in heaven. The weakness of Eve in the Garden of Eden caused man to be superior to woman and so man should rule over women on Earth. Beverly Campbell attempts to correct this misinterpretation of Eve and her role in the Fall. Campbell suggests that instead of Eve being an easily tricked villain, she is instead a hero of the creation story and a perfect role model for women in modern times. Campbell addresses certain questions, uses quotations, and emphasis to convince her LDS audience that Eve was aware of what she was doing and she is in fact a heroine.

Campbell defines fifteen points that the world has misunderstood about the story of the Fall, that when completely understood vindicates Eve from the sin of eating the fruit, and praises her for her action. Campbell makes each of her fifteen points the topic of each of her paragraphs. This allows readers to clearly understand what they are reading and makes it easier to find a point that they are looking for. The topics of each paragraph are written in the form of a question which makes the readers question their own beliefs of Campbell’s points. By giving each one of her points its own paragraph Campbell may even make people ask themselves questions that they have never thought about before. By making the reader question what they believe first the reader is more willing to listen to what Campbell is saying. By asking these fifteen questions Campbell makes the reader question what they believe and then offers an answer that supports Eve’s role in the Creation and the Fall.

These fifteen points would not have been effective if it wasn’t for Campbell’s use of sources. Campbell uses quotations from scriptures, prophets, and specialists on the subject. By using sources with authority readers will be more likely to listen and believe what Campbell is trying to say. Campbell is clearly writing for an LDS audience because of the many prophets and apostles she quotes. If Campbell was attempting to reach out to a broader audience she would have used many diverse religious sources to convince her audience instead of alienating them. By writing for an LDS audience Campbell’s use of quotations from prophets and apostles strongly supports her claims that Eve was a heroine and not a villain and serves her purpose of convincing people to believe that too.

In some of her quotes Campbell adds emphasis to different words, drawing the attention of the reader and being able to expound on a certain point, as in “God, blessed them (emphasis added)” (276). By italicizing the word “them” Campbell draws the reader’s attention to it and then expounds on it. This allows her to utilize the prophet’s words even though that may not have been his original intent. Campbell’s true genius however is when she italicizes her own explanations. By emphasizing her own explanations like she does for quotes from general authorities, Campbell gives the appearance of making her points look like that of a prophet. Once again this adds more weight to her own explanations.

Campbell wrote a convincing essay to the LDS community about the importance of Eve and her divine role in Heavenly Father’s plan. Through her use of organizing the paragraphs, quotations, and emphasis Campbell portrays Eve in the light that she was meant to be in. By clearing up misconceptions about Eve Campbell has created another heroine in the scriptures that is an amazing example for women in the church.

17 comments:

  1. Maybe this is an odd request, but I think you might benefit from expounding a little more on her audience in the beginning. I know that you mention that she writes to Latter-day Saints, but with a topic such as this, she is really playing up LDS interpretations. Is she writing only to Latter-day Saints or is she using LDS doctrine to address a wider audience?

    I like that you pointed out and analyzed her organization and use of her fifteen points. I do think your analysis is a bit shallow beyond that, and that you could discuss more about her essay- she uses appeals to pathos of both women AND men, by empowering women and then challenging men to accept a truer image of Eve; she appeals to ethos, I think, too, because while she talks to both women AND men, there is definitely a feel that she is speaking directly to women in many parts. In your concluding sentence, you say something along those lines- that she describes Eve as an "amazing example for women in the church."

    Expound on that before the conclusion, perhaps, because that's both her purpose for writing AND a powerful tool in putting down false notions of Eve.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This article was very insightful. The author did some great research and proved her point efficiently. It's amazing to see how the plain and simple truths of the gospel can be viewed so differently because of translation errors and tampering in the text. I saw Eve with a fresh perspective after reading the article.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm really not sure how much the things you listed sound like "tools," per se... Maybe they could be reworded to sound more like actual devices?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think that the author really found an interesting balance to her writing. I feel that usually within writing, people don't want to hear from "Whiney feminists" that only complain about things that they don't offer solutions to. In the case of this article, she sort of attacks many opposing views with threats that they will be some sort of bigot if they don't agree. Unlike other authors, she offers solutions to the problems that she brings up.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My Religion class talked about the story of Adam and Eve recently and so it was very interesting to read this article.

    Good work pointing out Campbell's structure in your second paragraph. I would have appreciated an example of what you were talking about in your third paragraph. You might find the 1,2,3,4 Using Examples hand out on Blackboard useful.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I encourage you to rephrase the first sentence in the second-to-last paragraph, as "In some of her quotes" is a rather weak way to start out. Otherwise, nice dissection of technique and overall approach.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think you could have supported your choice of devices better--I wasn't quite sure what they were, especially since you never quoted the author or gave an example of what she did. All I know about this article, from your analysis, is that the author thinks eve is a heroine... Which may be true, but it's still her fault that pregnancy and childbirth suck. sorry if I sound a little bitter...All Adam had to do was work hard for his food. I think Eve got off worse.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The first body paragraph is not clearly identified in the these. Instead of saying "addressing certain questions" say that she used organization or structure. "Addressing certain questions" isn't really a tool...

    You have good points, but I want you to expound on them more. For example, in the first body paragraph you say "By giving each one of her points its own paragraph Campbell may even make people ask themselves questions that they have never thought about before." This is the what. But how and why does this happen. An analysis answers the "what" with "why" "how".

    I would add some more specifics about her actual writing as well. Your essay seems vague and it makes me wonder if the author of "Mother Eve" was vague or if you just didn't read it in depth.

    Work on these things and it will be a great essay!

    ReplyDelete
  9. In your second paragraph, you started 3 sentences in row with the "By doing this..." formula. Switch it up a little.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The organization of your essay is very great, and very clear. It also flows very well. Maybe you could use more quotes to support? However, the analysis of the essay was overall very good.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I thought that you had a really good thesis statement and paper - the fact that you made sure to address which audience Campbell was speaking to added strength, especially for your second point.
    I feel that your first point, while it made sense in the body paragraph, was a little vague in the thesis. It seemed to me that you were addressing the structure that Campbell followed.
    Overall, good paper!

    ReplyDelete
  12. the analysis was well done

    ReplyDelete
  13. Nicely expressed! I liked your thesis.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I loved your introduction and thesis, they set the paper up to be structured throughout. You have some great topic sentences but one or two of them could use some work transitioning. The one that stuck out the most was in the 4th paragraph. Nice work overall!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Great job your thesis was clear and you gave a great analysis!

    ReplyDelete
  16. I thought that this was an interesting article, especially the viewpoint that the author provided about the Eve story

    ReplyDelete